rewrite this content and keep HTML tags
The guesses between talking about real differences swing between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the Gaza war, and statements that deny the existence of a crisis between the two parties, and that the matter is nothing more than a variation in the order of priorities.
Axius quoted a US official as saying that US Vice President J. Vice President Vice President has retracted the thinking of Israel “so that you do not understand that it is support from Washington to expand Tel Aviv its military operations in Gaza.”
In this context, the first researcher at the Al -Jazeera Center for Studies believes that Makki’s visit is that the cancellation of Di Vance’s visit is the second blow after Trump ignored Israel’s visit on his last Gulf tour.
According to Makki’s speech to the “Beyond the News” program, Trump wanted to send his deputy to Israel “breaking the dispute between the two sides”, but the start of the “Gideon” military operation without informing Washington led to its abolition.
Accordingly, Washington wanted this step – according to Makki – to inform Israel not to act on its own and that it should see in detail about the Israeli behavior, and not when Netanyahu wanted.
In turn, Ihab Jabareen, an Israeli writer, expressed his conviction that the American green light began to extinguish, but there are no signs of the red light of Washington.
Jabareen said that there is a soft American reservation, but he considered this “falling in the context of pressure on Israel, but did not reach the phase of punishment.”
As for Israel, it tries to change from the rules of the game in the field, and embarrass the United States, which may lead Netanyahu to a kind of rebellion and stubbornness, and Washington showed that it abandoned it in the midst of a decisive battle.
Jabareen concluded that Israel realizes that it has space to maneuver with the American side despite the price it paid internationally.
Trump complains
Regarding the policy of the American President, Makki expressed his conviction that Trump is grumbling due to Netanyahu’s delay in resolving Gaza and the failure to achieve a real achievement on the ground, which creates human repercussions that pressure America in its Arab and international relations, and provides an internationally solid Palestinian account.
He stressed that Trump agrees with Netanyahu not to see the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and the resistance in Gaza, as well as the idea of displacement from the American desire, noting that Netanyahu remains a “temporary problem, at a time when Israel is still part of the American national security.”
He inferred by saying that America is identical to the war, which is part of it, as it is the main provider of weapons to Israel and protects it politically.
For his part, Jabareen stressed that Washington does not talk about the two -state solution or the Palestinian issue, as it is satisfied with addressing the next day for Gaza, stressing that Washington “does not try to prevent Israel from victory, but rather is trying to prevent Netanyahu’s dragging to defeat.”
He pointed out that Israel continues to occupy, siege, settle, and Judaize the Palestinian territories, noting that it is “classic soft tools that harm tactically but not strategic.”
The fate of negotiations
Makki concluded that Trump wants to make the true round of Doha negotiations over the ceasefire and the exchange of prisoners, but Israel wants to disarm Hamas and expel its leaders from Gaza and put this as a prerequisite for ending the war, if described as intractable.
He said that the current Doha negotiations represents the last opportunity to complete an agreement that releases the prisoners detained in Gaza, suggesting the killing of the prisoners if the “Gideon vehicles” operation is launched by the force that Israel is talking about.
On the other hand, Israel entered the battle of the 90th minute – according to Jabarin – as it climbed militarily to achieve two things, namely the absence of a diplomatic option, and mixing the papers with an escalation that marginalizes the new horizon.