Khartoum – After he remained a goal approaching the moment he achieved and turned away for years, Dr. Kamel Idris Al -Tayeb became the head of the Council of Ministers, a Dramanian or Dramani figure who belongs to this city with all meanings and meanings of belonging, and drank through the emergence and education in it the culture of the Sudanese medium represented by Omdurman, which has become a symbol of the university icons of the Sudanese personality icons.
He has abundant luck from academic training in his legal pronouncement in specialization and teaching, and has an estimated balance in knowledge of the world outside his country, where he worked in the Sudanese Foreign Ministry and occupied two sessions of the head of the United Nations Intellectual Property Organization.
In a path of aspiration for a political role in his country, he wrote a book he published in 2015, in which he sought to present a vision on the path of Sudan towards the future entitled “Sudan 2025 Evaluation of the Path and the Dream of the Future.”
Before he became always attending the list of candidacy for the prime minister in stations that are disturbed by turmoil since the overthrow of the rescue system, he nominated for the presidency of the Republic as a competitor to former President Omar al -Bashir in the 2010 presidential elections. Despite his long presence outside Sudan, he is in contact with events, topics and electricity of politics since the days of President Jaafar Al -Numairi.
Challenges
A close relationship with the last two political leaders of the political leaders, Al -Sadiq al -Mahdi, head of the Umma Party and Hassan al -Turabi, the leader of the Islamic movement, was known, and he was the one who entertained them and organized the meeting that brought them together in May 1999, a meeting that settled in the literature of Sudanese politics in the name of “Geneva meeting”, the Mahdi was then opposed and Al -Turabi as president of parliament before the famous joints between the Islamists, and ended with the Geneva agreement between the Geneva agreement between the Geneva agreement The two leaders, who many see that it would change the face of Sudan if it is worthy of it.
Today, Kamel Idris takes over the prime minister in the wake of Sudan’s circumstances and most of its days.
Whatever Idris’s cognitive and political preparations, the challenges that he faces, on their complexity, are the criterion of success and failure in them clearly, can be calculated clearly and measuring the extent of his achievement, and facing challenges that crowd with another.
The most important challenge is to confront the state of administrative liquidity that characterized the country’s image of chaos from the last days of President Al -Bashir and through the years after its overthrow, and until the outbreak of the war, reaching the day of Dr. Kamel Idris, the prime minister, what can be described by the administrative scene of the economy and politics is a state of fragility that approaches the dissolution, which led to the waste of the country’s resources and weaken people’s living conditions with the repercussions of displacement, and asylum Which has long been more than 25% of the population.
The second challenge is the blatant state of regional and international external interference, according to the estimate of the consensus approximately from many Sudanese political forces and observers of the country’s affairs, until it became a game for the slapping of external agendas and the creation of the wills of influence and control in its path and fate.
Among the most important keys to external abuse that remained pressures for systems such as the African Union, “Igad”, the United Nations and a number of countries is the necessity of the independent civil façade of the authority in Sudan.
practical control
Many believe that Dr. Idris takes the leadership of the Council of Ministers that would respond to the challenge of external pressure despite the difficulties surrounding this, and the approach of an external policy that works in two directions that require constipation with the threads of reconciliation with high skills, so what is required in terms of recovering the decision and localizing external trends according to the standards of the Sudanese interest, and on the other hand in response to the criteria and requirements of abuse that avoids the country more confrontation, especially since the level of intervention The external reached the involvement in the war diaries.
This puts on the foreign policy industry team the role of maximum risk management, and the most important indicators of the ability to do so is the degree of independence enjoyed by the Idris government, and the degree of consistency between the levels of power in the sovereignty and ministers.
And if the decision of the Speaker of the Sovereign Council, Abdel -Fattah al -Burhan, indicates the abolition of the assignment of the supervision of the members of the Council on the ministries to the intention to achieve the requirement of the independence of the Council of Ministers, then the consistency between the levels of power is awaiting a practical test.
The external affairs is a path in which the threads ended up with some to the point of overlapping in a tissue in which it is difficult to sort the colors between dependency and patriotism, and for this the skill of walking in it needs caution and caution so that the chances of national liberation are not impossible for slides of empowerment of external will.
The Prime Minister and his team faces the challenges of managing crises, in which success is a necessary introduction to the establishment of a new take -off of the country and paving the road for a national standpoint in which the country deposits its crises and avoids the tear agendas, and extracts the war of the war it fought, and this requires determining the program and role clearly and consensus. This requires mobilizing the largest national political bloc whose views are accompanied by the visions and the program that the entire government of Idris is working to implement.
On the rudeness of the absence of the national dialogue, his presence creates a state of consensus that avoids the government to waste energy in containing the conflict between the components of the bloc supporting it. What external interference is intensifying – as many see – except from the loopholes of the Sudanese inability to manage a political dialogue between their various political forces or the slowdown in downloading what they agree on the reality of their lives.
The “Samoud” coalition denounces the support of the African Union to appoint Kamel Idris as Prime Minister #SudanWhat are the reasons?#Al -Jazeera pic.twitter.com/nq2fj7h5om
– Al -Jazeera Mubasher (@ajmubasher) May 22, 2025
Caution is a duty
The challenge of consensus and national consensus is not a purely political. Rather, the war resulted in a social rupture of tribal forces with a great impact to confront the state in the interest of authoritarian aspirations for tribal members and heads, which produced the state of social rift from which the country groans, and this is a challenge that requires a popular effort managed by the government with consciousness that activates what the contemporary political language of the Sudanese has fascinated by the rise of the social fabric.
Since the biggest challenge in the country is security because of the war that has threatened its existence, the country’s maximum priority is to strengthen its defensive thorn, which is the army leadership initially undertaken in its operational face, but the Idris government is concerned with political push in the direction of strengthening and affirming this priority in its political discourse, economic priorities and external payments, in order to raise the country threatening military vulnerability.
Of course, this includes contributing to the design of political ends of the war, preventing the manufacture of the reasons for its renewal and strengthening the holding of national unity, and establishing a consensus on the army’s position in the politics map and the area in which it moves, in order to achieve the balance of the goals between the military and civil role.
The assignment of Dr. Kamel Idris at first glance sparked a state of political division between supporters and opponents, but the acceptance rates soon, especially from the political forces supporting the “War of Dignity”, which the army is fighting against the Rapid Support Forces.
Despite the flow of this in the interest of Idris, whoever knows the fluctuations of political weather in Sudan needs a lot of caution, the supportive position is not a check on white but rather some of his motives are not based on a sober political analysis, but rather the state of the wig in which all the new is the whiff of hope, Dr. Kamel Idris and his team must refer it to a conscious choice that enhances him every day the progress in the right path.