Pictures of famine from Gaza embarrassed the western world, shook the rest of the world. He had to go, and he, himself, to Gaza to say from there, “There is no famine.” It does not make sense for what he said and he is wandering except to waste his country’s moral balance, which is a balance that is difficult to see with the naked eye.
Madeleine Ulbright, the Strong Secretary of State, said in the late nineties of the last century; The world cannot dispense with America, as it is the garrison of the global system based on rules. Until that moment, America had fought about 400 war outside its borders, and sponsors the “global regime based on bases” through 800 military rulers spread on the planet.
The country where the world is indispensable is not a member of the International Court of Justice, does not recognize the privacy of the International Criminal Court, and does not care for any “international body” of a legal nature. It is now implementing, with Israel, the worst massacre that humanity has known, and chases international judges who dared to consider the massacre papers.
So far, there is no air image of the crime in Gaza, and the European press is still listed by the numbers of the victims, adorned with a professional sentence that says, “According to Hamas’s medical authorities.”
It comes to bureaucratic approaches to what was going on, so hunger images seemed more exciting than destruction. The ethical bureaucracy gives hunger more legal weight than it gives to war.
In the past two days, the German newspaper TAZ- a left-wing newspaper- published a lengthy report in which a group of researchers involved whether what is going on in Gaza is a human extermination “Genocide “Ornament or ethnic “Ethnic Cleansing.
The discussion took a purely bureaucratic character, and there is a continuous referral to what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From a bureaucratic point of view, what happened in the two cities cannot be described as genocide, despite the annihilation of the entire population.
The nuclear crime lacks a document confirming a clear intention to kill the Japanese as a specific ethnic or national. The goals of US President Truman- and this was what Professor Mercehimer’s in his recent meeting with Taker Carlson- to end the bad war. That is, he exterminated two cities for noble reasons.
The bureaucracy, that is, the papers of employees, is the one who determines the noble or evil nature of the verb. This is what he tried to work when he went to Gaza as an eyewitness, and there he said that he saw goods and medicines on their way to Gaza. There is no intention of starvation, there are only bureaucratic and security problems.
In the year 1944, the Jewish-Polish lawyer, Rafael, could sculpt the term human extermination of two Greek words: Genos, which means the type, and Cide It means killing. He worked on developing his idea in his famous book: “The Ruling of the Axis in the occupied EuropeE. His intellectual efforts in adopting the United Nations have succeeded in the human extermination agreement since 1948. It was possible for a knot to define human genocide, which is ““That is, the human community is destroyed, eachHey Or partiallyOn the basis of ethnic, national or religious.
The International Criminal Court, nor any other court, has not condemned any state with the crime of human genocide so far. With regard to Nazi Germany, the document of the “final solution to the Jewish issue” that dates back to a meeting of the Nazi leadership in 1942 was considered evidence of the intention to destroy the Jewish group on a religious-ethnic basis, but Germany as a country has not been condemned.
The Human Extermination Agreement, which was developed in 1948, does not operate retroactively. Instead, individuals from within the Nazi regime were convicted.
The two massacres that took place in Rwanda 1994, and in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1995, they were ranked by the International Court of Justice as a human extermination, but neither of the two countries did not come as an actor.
Human genocide occurred in the two countries, and members of the underground and states were convicted. There is no state that has so far been convicted of a human genocide since 1948. This makes linking Israel to the idea of human genocide is an extremely sensitive issue to the entire Western world. It is unlikely that the state that has arisen by human genocide is the first country in history to be condemned by committing the act itself.
It looks like a “nightmare from another planet,” says Yoli Novak, a well -known Israeli Battelm organization. In her evaluation of what is going on in Gaza, Battelm reached a conclusion that puts the Gaza massacre in the human genocide.
In its presentation of the report, Novak chanted sad expressions like: “It would not have occurred to us that we would one day write what we wrote here,” that is, the recognition that her country is involved in the crime of genocide.
The Israelis pressures their allies, but rather blackmail them with their past. Biden admitted, after visiting Israel in the early days of the war, that he addressed Netanyahu by saying: “You cannot destroy these urban societies,” the latter replied by reminding him of what America did in Japan and Germany during World War II.
Biden’s disclosure is the content of the conversation that took place between them indicates an early Israeli intention to turn Gaza into a land that is not suitable for living, that is, undermining the human group in Gaza without discrimination, and because it represents a specific nationality. Here the definition of extermination intersects with the definition of ethnic cleansing, and the criminal intent appears to be available.
The Israelis argue in open discussions by referring to the destructive registry of European societies in large regions of the world, in many historical contexts. A European country rarely recognized its past in extermination, if we ignore the moral allegations of post -colonial.
Returning to modern German history, Germany carried out between 1904-1908 human genocide against the Hero tribes in Namibia, which was called “southwest of Germany.”
In response to the country’s population rebellion against injustice and exploitation, the German commander of Atthar Von Trota commanded his soldiers to exterminate Herro as a race, “all Hero must be expelled from the country, whether they are armed or not, with or without their livestock, they will be shot.”
It is similar to what von Trota said the story of the Prophet Joshua in the Book of Joshua, as he ordered the yard of Jericho, humans, trees and animals. In the past few days, more than two -thirds of the Israelis, according to a study by the University of Pennsylvania, said that they do not mind that Gaza will gain the fate of Jericho.
Germany has been delayed more than a century before it recognized, very twisting, that what happened in Namibia represents a human extermination. Despite her recognition that her “forces”- not the ruling regime- committed a human extermination, she refused to assume any legal responsibility. It was also not condemned by the crime on any legal platform, so the genocide document does not retroactively operate.
Germany and late Germany recognition in Namibia touched the idea of “uniqueness of the Holocaust”, and perhaps insulted it. It was a historical error in estimating a large number of Jewish intellectuals and researchers in Israel and abroad.
The Holocaust “an event that goes beyond history, but rather a challenge of understanding,” says Israeli writer Eli Vizel, who won the Nobel Prize in Peace 1986.
The Jewish historian Deboura Lipshdad refuses, such as many Jewish historians, to talk about human genocide in Namibia or Rwanda; Because this would lead to “diluting the Holocaust privacy”. The jamming of the Holocaust by distributing condemnation right and family will threaten the uniqueness of the Holocaust, and thus the most important Jewish heritage.
However, history took Israel itself to the category of condemnation, and it became the one who disrupts itself, and burns all its inheritance.
Western academics, as well as politics and literature, worked in order to make the Holocaust the nucleus of liberal civilization, and the central moral standard. It was banned, by law, that is, academic or scientific activity approaching the Holocaust issue, and researchers were mentioned, and they were placed in prisons, because they dared to hold accountable the Holocaust novel, as happened with Gertar Rudolph in the 1990s.
Rudolf had conducted chemical research on the remains of “gas rooms” in the Auschwitz camp, and claimed that what he found did not absolutely support the presence of gas killing rooms. His publication to search led to a chase that lasted for a few years, which ended with the American authorities found him hiding in a suburb of Chicago, and returned him to Germany, and there he was placed in prison in 2007.
Early, in 1949, the German-Jewish critic Theodore Adorno launched in an article entitled “Culture and Criticism”, his famous sentence: to write poetry after the Holocaust is a barbarian work. The Holocaust was surrounded by an impenetrable fence, until Israel shot it itself.
Gaza is an Israeli dilemma that devoured a full century of propaganda, and destroyed the center of Western civilization. Before the Holocaust took its final image, as a center of ethics and a juvenile above history, the novel “Exidos”, for UNIN Yuis, published in 1958, had made the way to Western consciousness and paved the atmosphere.
In the novel, the survivors of the Holocaust migrate on the back of the Xidos, come to average, collide with the British and Arab forces, and then win.
The moral, historical compensation, which the Jewish community obtained in that land is the fairness that was late for two years. He would not have happened if the Jewish group had not preserved its moral and religious uniqueness throughout history, and resisted the winds of nations and history with courage, they said it. From that moral uniqueness, from redemption and victory, the most moral army in the world came out, the Israel Defense Army.
The Israeli dilemma in Gaza is a vehicle. A large number of Western newspapers have chosen in the past few days the word “pariah” or “pariah” in referring to Israel. And the ostracism here is not only political, but morally and historically. That is, Israel is isolated even from its historical heritage. Israel is based on a moral claim in the first place, then it is based on a political claim.
In the past decades, many sources of power have accumulated, foremost of which is absolute support from Western liberalism on the one hand, and from the American Evangelical on the other hand. But, as she reaches the top of her glory, she fell into the temptation of absolute power, and she became a victim of her belief that she could do whatever she wants.
This is how the Israeli novelist David Grossman saw her in his latest meeting with the Italian newspaper La Repubblya. The force led her to oppression, and the oppression took her to genocide. As she fell into the grip of the extreme, jihadist jihadist, it became clear that she slipped into an existential trouble that is not easy to get out of. According to Shlomo bin Ami, Israel has not witnessed a collapse of its place among the nations, as happened now.
That position collapsed not only in the global south, but in the world, at the moment of absolute power. Israel was not satisfied with going to the far right, where the blind biblical jihadist, but threw itself in the bosom of President Trump. To look like an ethical project for a man whose intentions do not know.
All references say that Israel has sank inside itself, and it is no longer able to break. A study carried out by the Israeli researcher d. Nawa Lavi, 2016, that “Israeli youth” is the most extreme compared to Western European countries.
This will be confirmed by the Israel Democracy Institute, 2018, in a resounding poll that its results said that 64% of Israeli youth between 18-34 years classify themselves “right”, while only 47% of the older said they are right.
It is an inverse and unknown scene in any other country. As the choices of the most modern generations are usually more open and less radical.
All the data leads us to one result, which is that Israel today is not that magic country embodied by the novel Ixidos, the novel whose sales in America excelled over the novel “Gold with the Wind”, and it was secondly after the Bible.
With this complexity, Western liberalism finds itself in trouble and in trouble. She fights the populist right in its countries and supports it in all ways in Israel. However, the Israeli version of the right sheds all the fascism images that Europe has known in its history.
In the past two years, a cultural war exploded in the Western world in light of what is going on in Gaza, and that war is still in its beginnings. And because Israel is going on in its biblical dream, the liberal Western options will seem crucial: either to support an international system based on the rules, or that the change of rules and laws down at the desire of the biblical dream. In both cases, the Israeli crisis deepens, and its allies dragged with it to its existential dilemma.
The opinions in the article do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al -Jazeera.
