Iran’s messages to Washington .. Do their differences or exacerbate their differences? | news


|

Iran renews its position rejecting the negotiation of what it calls its right to enrich uranium or its missile ability during any future negotiations with the Americans, which was confirmed by the statements of Iranian officials at various levels. This comes as Washington believes that Iran was severely weakened in the recent American attack on its nuclear facilities and that it is obliged to waive its nuclear ambitions.

He expressed the Iranian position of the presidential office, which said that Tehran will not negotiate its missile ability, nuclear knowledge and enrichment, and that if it returns to negotiate, it will not allow the use of his table to deceive again, and the same position was announced by Parliament Speaker Muhammad Baqir Qalibaf, saying that “uranium enrichment has become an Iranian national legacy that cannot be eliminated by bombs or assassinating individuals.”

Qalibaf said – in an interview with Iranian television – that the missile capacity represents what he called a red line for Tehran and will not retreat from it in all circumstances.

These statements come in the context of Iran’s response to messages it received from the American administration, says Dr. Fatima Al -Smadi, the first researcher at the Al -Jazeera Center for Studies and the expert in Iranian affairs in her talk to the “Beyond Al -Khobar” program.

Tehran denied last Tuesday that she had submitted any request to negotiate with Washington, contrary to what US President Donald Trump stated after the Israeli and American attacks on nuclear facilities in Iran.

Inside Iran, there is a widespread controversy over the issue of returning to negotiations with Washington after the recent attack, as there are those who see in negotiation a strategic option, and there are those who oppose this issue from the ground, given that the Israeli -American attack occurred in the midst of talks between Washington and Tehran on the Iranian nuclear program, which was preserved by Iranian guide Ali Khamenei, as Al -Smadi asserts.

Iranian President Masoud Bouchakian was subjected to sharp criticism from several conservative newspapers in the country, after he supported the resumption of negotiations with the United States during an interview with American journalist Taker Karson.

It is reported that on June 13, Israel launched a war against Iran with the aim of “preventing it from possessing nuclear weapons.” This came while the United States and Iran were fighting negotiations on the Tehran nuclear program.

Later the states intervened in the war, and on June 22, the UNANID enrichment site in Fordo, south of Tehran, bombed on June 22, and two nuclear establishments in Isfahan and Natanz (center).

Change the approach

If Iran accepts to return to negotiations with the Americans, it will be presented to the negotiating table – adding Al -Smadi – the idea of ​​fertilization outside its territory, and will show its willingness to return to fertilization by a low rate, as happened in the 2015 agreement.

As for the missile force, it will be a fundamental point of disagreement in any upcoming negotiations, because the Iranian Revolutionary Guard – Al -Smadi Communication – will not be allowed to put it on negotiation because it considers it its great achievement, and if the matter happens, it will be with many heads.

In Trump’s US administration accounts, Iran has weakened as a result of the recent strikes, and therefore there will be no uranium enrichment and will not have a missile program, and it must – as the journalist specializing in American affairs, Muhammad Al -Minshawi, explains that it changes the approach that it adopts for years and is more realistic, as it (i.e. the American administration) refuses to revive the 2015 agreement.

Although the actual scope of the damage caused by the American bombing of Iranian nuclear sites has not yet been known, Israel shares its American ally that Iran has weakened, but it imagines that the political scene in this country must be changed even with non -military tools, and about this point, the head of the political science department at the University of Hebron, Dr. Bilal Al -Shobaki for the program “Beyond the News”, says that Israel has a conviction that Iran is the octopus that carries out operations Against it.



Source link

Related posts

The exacerbation of famine doubles the suffering of a Ghazi family, so what is its story? | news

What does the Gaza Strip need to overcome starvation? | policy

Netanyahu Trump calls and talks about a “quick operation” in Gaza news