Criticism of the Prime Minister of Sweden for his reliance on “Chat GBT” technology

Swedish Prime Minister Olf Christmson faces severe criticism after he confessed to a “Chat BT” advice constantly as part of his daily work tasks, according to a report published by the Guardian.

Christmson asserts that his use of artificial intelligence tools was not only limited to “Chat GBT”, but also extended to the French artificial intelligence tool “Lechat”, adding that his colleagues also use these tools.

He added in his conversation with the Swedish newspaper for the business “Dagns Industry”, describing his use of the tool: “I use it a lot, and if this is only for a second opinion: What do others do? And do we have to think about the exact opposite? .. This is the type of questions that I ask for it.”

These comments caused a wave of wide criticism that affected Christmson and his right -wing party from technology experts around the world, due to the various concerns that could result from artificial intelligence models.

The Swedish newspaper “Aftonbadet” also accused him of falling into the trap of artificial intelligence obsession with the wealthy of the western world, in the opening it provided to its latest numbers. Simon Fisher Hobner, a researcher at the University of Carlsad, warned in her conversation with the newspaper “Aftonbladet” against using artificial intelligence tools with sensitive information related to work.

For his part, the spokesperson for Christerson confirmed that the Swedish Prime Minister did not risk using artificial intelligence techniques, stressing that he did not share any sensitive or secret information with the tool, but rather relied on it to obtain general guesses.

In turn, Virginia Dignum considered the professor of artificial intelligence responsible at the University of Umia that artificial intelligence is not able to provide his own or neutral opinion regarding political issues and ideas, but it simply reflects the opinions of those who built it as well as the information that was trained on it.

“We must demand the guarantee of reliability and reliability, as we have not voted for the GPT robot.”