7/27/2025–|Last update: 02:11 (Mecca time)
After a state of optimism prevailed over the past days about the possibility of reaching a ceasefire agreement that can alleviate the catastrophic human reality, the image suddenly turned, and the Israelis and Americans announcedNaham will discuss a new approach to the restoration of the prisoners, carrying the Islamic Resistance Movement (agitation) Responsibility for thwarting the deal.
The former US State Department official, Thomas Warric, held Hamas responsible for famine in Gaza, because it refused to sign the last proposal, and said that Donald Trump is aware of the size of the humanitarian catastrophe in the Strip “but he will not give up the demand for Hamas’s disarmament.”
It is noteworthy that the American mediator close to Trump Bishara Bhahbah said that Hamas proposed during the last agreement to hand over the sector administration to the Technocrats Committee in preparation for its transfer to the Palestinian Authority, and that Israel rejected this proposal.
American position
Warric defended – during his participation in the “Path of Events” program – of the Israeli -American position by saying that Hamas accepted the abandonment of power, but refused to abandon the weapon that would make it able to restore control whenever it wanted after the war ended.
Warric’s conversation contradicts a hadith with Habih, who clearly said that Israel’s refusal to hand over the sector to the Palestinian Authority reflects its desire to displace the population. It is a position that many organizations and countries have echoed over the past weeks.
While the Secretary -General of the United Nations and the UN raitors talk about a catastrophe that modern history has not seen, and the need to introduce aid to civilians who have been familiar with, the Israel Broadcasting Authority confirmed that the Israeli army destroyed tens of thousands of tons of humanitarian relief materials, including large quantities of food that were dedicated to the people of the Strip.
While it was expected that the American president will intervene to put an end to these violations – which the Norwegian Minister of International Development said it has crossed all the borders – he came out confirming that Israel should continue to work until the existence of Hamas.
The Israeli army also came out, declaring that the United Nations and international organizations are responsible for delivering aid to the Gaza residents, ignoring that it is the one who prohibits the work of these institutions, even bombards its facilities and warehouses and kills its employees.
The army has announced it The aid will begin to be removed, which was described by the UNRWA UNRWA agency, and its Secretary -General Philip Lazarini said that it was “a lamb for the eye in the eyes”, as it considered it The International Salvation Committee, “Just a horrific dispersion of the truth of what is currently required in the sector.”
Wrik did not deny the effectiveness of this method to save people, and he said that the world should search for all the ways in which aid can be delivered, including opening the wild crossings, but he also stressed the need to “ensure that Hamas does not benefit from this aid.”
Calling Talmudic epics
This American -Israeli narrative of the robbery of the resistance on aid, was denied by Israeli officials of the New York Times, saying that the army has no evidence of Hamas theft of aid, and if The United Nations aid system undermined Israel was effective and more reliable.
Accordingly, everything that Israel says or does is nothing more than an attempt to starve and displace the population, in the opinion of the Palestinian political analyst Iyad Al -Qara, who said that what is being introduced from the scarce quantities goes to the militias that work with the occupation in the Strip.
As for the expert in the Israeli affairs Ihab Jabareen, he went beyond that by saying that Israeli diplomacy lost its depth and turned into populism because it tries to dye what is happening all with a religious character.
The follower of the statements of Israeli politicians, including Netanyahu himself, will find that they are derived from Isaiah prophecies, and that they are trying to create what can be described as military theology to make the war sacred with all its tools, whatever it is contrary to ethics, as Jabareen says.
Hence, the problem is not in the way to deliver aid to the Palestinians, but rather in stopping the same war, which has become based on Talmudic epics that this land is owned exclusively to the chosen people and that everyone else is nothing but changes that must be killed or expelled, regardless of the method, according to Jabareen.
Perhaps this is what the United States must pay attention to and its consequences in the long run, because Israel abandons its association with the Holocaust after it has lost its morals, and tries to link all its crimes to religious texts, according to Jabarin.
