7/15/2025–|Last update: 01:03 (Mecca time)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu -who is required of the International Criminal Court -continued his statements regarding the ceasefire negotiations and the exchange of ongoing prisoners in Qatar, raising questions and speculation about what this longer right -wing seeks to survive in the history of Israel.
Netanyahu said that he agreed to the exchange deal only “if it is good”, while bad deals will not accept them, speaking about “the need for Gaza to be ruled by people who do not want to destroy Israel.”
Netanyahu’s statements coincide with what was reported by the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth about American sources of the families of the prisoners as saying that President Donald Trump is tired of the war in Gaza, but Netanyahu managed to gain an additional time.
The negotiations between the delegations of the Palestinian resistance and Israel focus on the proposed maps to spread the Israeli forces inside Gaza, at a time when the mediators are trying to find solutions that will bridge the remaining gaps and maintain the momentum of negotiations, according to the Israeli Broadcasting Authority.
Two days ago, Netanyahu said that he agreed to the proposal of the American presidential envoy Steve Witkev, then the version proposed by the brokers to complete an exchange deal, claiming that it was the Hamas movement that refused them, and confirmed his adherence to the condition of returning the prisoners and eliminating Hamas.
It appears that the torrent of statements that Netanyahu recently made is nothing but fake excuses and expressions on the issue of military rule and the displacement of Gazans, according to the spokesman of political affairs, Saeed Ziyad, to the “Path of Events” program.
The modified withdrawal maps grant widespread security control to Israel, especially on Salah al -Din Street, which connects the northern Gaza Strip to the south, as well as controlling the lives of people.
Despite the decline in the prevalence of the occupation forces in the Gaza Strip from 36% to 28% during the supposed truce, the new percentage remains an isolated geographical area in the south, and Israeli military control over vital areas in the northern and eastern Gaza Strip.
In this context, the “Axios” website stated that the Israeli negotiators presented updated maps that included additional reduction in the presence of the army in the southern part of the Strip.
Under the new maps, the Israeli forces will remain in an area that is no more than two kilometers north of the Philadelphia axis along the border between Gaza and Egypt.
But the head of the Department of Political Science at the University of Hebron, Bilal Al -Shobaki, does not see in the statements of Netanyahu a dramatic shift, as he has always spoken of a temporary ceasefire, and he never used diplomatic phrases, but rather focused on returning the prisoners and then resuming the war.
Netanyahu’s concern about a partial deal stems from the United States -led regional arrangements leading to a new reality, which prompted him to meet with a minister for security and finance Itamar bin Ghafir and Bamliel Smotrich for the purpose of reassurance and keeping them in the containment circle.
Based on this situation, Israel appears to be determined to go towards a military rule that keeps the new aid mechanism led by the “Gaza Humanitarian Foundation” as well as keeping the militias ruling hands south of the Gaza Strip – according to Ziyad – along with the “human city” in Rafah as a bridge towards displacement.
Likewise, Netanyahu arrived – after more than 21 months of the war – a dead end after his failure to eliminate Hamas, which paves the way for the fabrication of pretexts towards a “southern buffer zone in preparation for the displacement of the Gazans.”
Resistance
On the other hand, the Palestinian resistance views that “time from blood”, but it does not want a deal at any price that Israel can continue the war or occupy Gaza and its military rule, at a time when it also learned that Israel did not triumph in the wars of attrition historically.
Between this and that, the resistance in the field is fighting with an economy in power – according to Ziyad – and a flexible defense that does not prevent the occupation forces from progressing, but rather incurred by the largest loss of losses, which makes time also the blood of the occupation, says Ziad.
In light of this scene, the resistance will not be accepted by any path that does not stop the war and cleans Gaza militarily from any Israeli forces, at a time when Israel wants negotiations to establish military incidents instead of withdrawing until the limits of the January agreement last.
In this context, the ambushes of the resistance and the battle of the field confirm that the Israeli political visions – by entering Gaza, imposing new facts and building a new administrative system – are not possible, according to Al -Shobaki.
But this Israeli confusion in the management of war, at the political and military levels, ends in the end to the option of displacing the Palestinians, according to the Palestinian academic.