Analysts: A buffer zone in Gaza will not provide security for Israel Policy


Occupied Jerusalem- Israeli estimates and analyzes unanimously agree that Benjamin Netanyahu’s government’s plan to establish a security buffer zone in the Gaza Strip is useless and will not provide security for Tel Aviv.

They also unanimously agreed that it will not undermine the military strength of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and will not deter it from approaching the security fence, and it is doomed to failure, like the security belt in southern Lebanon.

This plan was announced by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who informed US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken that, at the end of the war, Israel intends to establish a “deep buffer zone” in the Gaza Strip.

Security Minister Yoav Galant had vowed to remove Lebanese Hezbollah forces from the border area, and to make amendments to Security Council Resolution 1701, in a manner consistent with Israel’s demands and security interests.

Israeli tanks and armored vehicles near the border with the Gaza Strip (Getty)

Failed experiment

In turn, member of the “War Cabinet,” Minister Gideon Sa’ar, said, “The area of ​​Gaza must be reduced at the end of the war by establishing a buffer zone and targeting anyone who enters it.”

According to Israeli analyses, the buffer security zone in southern Lebanon kept the Israeli army in the Lebanese quagmire for at least 15 bloody years. In May 2000, after a popular protest, Ehud Barak’s government decided to withdraw and leave this region.

Under the title “The security tape in Gaza will not provide Israel with the security it has lost,” Zvi Barel, an analyst for Arab and Middle Eastern affairs in the newspaper “Haaretz,” wrote an article in which he said that “establishing a buffer zone on the border is not a new idea.”

Bar’el added, “But the experience of neighboring countries such as Egypt and Turkey shows that it does not put an end to national aspirations or the reality of occupation in the Palestinian territories in 1967, nor does it eliminate security threats.”

Bar’el described Israel’s experience in establishing a security buffer zone in southern Lebanon as a failure, explaining that the security strip it established on Lebanese territory also failed to achieve its goals of providing security for Israelis in the north and Upper Galilee, and it became a permanent battlefield with Hezbollah.

The analyst believes that the Israeli plan, which is rejected by the administration of US President Joe Biden, faces opposition from neighboring countries, pointing out that Israel has informed several Arab countries that it intends to establish this buffer zone at the end of the war.

According to Israeli reports, Tel Aviv shared the plan with Jordan, Egypt, the UAE, Turkey and Saudi Arabia, but without revealing the technical aspects of the future of the security sector.

But it can be assumed, according to Bar’el, that it is “a neutral zone that will extend along the entire border line between Israel and the Gaza Strip at a varying depth, and that its purpose is to prevent the infiltration of militants on foot or by motor vehicle.”

“A direct target of the resistance”

The working assumption of the buffer zone plan, from Barel’s point of view, is that the Gaza Strip “will remain a source of ground threat even after the end of the war, and even if the ballistic military threat is eliminated, but such a security strip should prevent the danger, or at least give security forces Security: Sufficient time to prepare for any emergency.

Even in the scenario of eliminating Hamas, the security tape, the Arab and Middle Eastern affairs analyst says, “will not give the citizens of Israel the security that was stolen from them due to Tel Aviv’s intentions to maintain security control in Gaza, and its rejection of any arrangements with any Palestinian government that will be formed in the Strip after the end of the war.” “.

He concluded by saying, “The Gaza Strip is a closed cage. Every piece of land seized for the benefit of the security strip will be accompanied by the displacement of thousands of residents who will be further crammed into an area that is already one of the most densely populated areas in the world.”

Bar’el continues, “The expected result does not require guesswork. Without any political arrangements after the war, the Israeli army in the buffer zone will become a direct target for the Palestinian resistance.”

“Sunk in mud”

For his part, lawyer Amiram Gil, a law professor at Reichman University (a multidisciplinary academic center in Herzliya), seemed shocked by the idea of ​​establishing a buffer zone along the security fence with the Gaza Strip.

He expressed this in an article on the Zaman Yisrael website entitled “A security belt in Gaza. Israel is on its way to repeating the mistake it made in Lebanon.”

Gil said that this buffer zone will not provide security for the Israelis, but rather will plunge Tel Aviv into a “fighting quagmire” with the Palestinians in Gaza, as it has been for many years in southern Lebanon. He added, “We hear statements by Israeli officials about a buffer zone with Gaza, and we do not believe them.”

Gil continued, “Twenty-three years after Israel was able to extricate itself from the quagmire of the security zone in southern Lebanon, and after looking at the past without drawing lessons, we are on our way to repeating the foolishness, this time in Gaza.”

The Israeli lecturer recalled that in 1985, three years after Tel Aviv entered the First Lebanon War, which claimed the lives of 650 Israeli soldiers, the government of Shimon Peres at the time decided to withdraw from most of the lands it had occupied in the war and establish a buffer zone in the south and control the area near the border to protect it. Towns in the Upper Galilee.

Gil wonders, “Can anyone imagine how the Israeli army will maintain the areas across the border with Gaza, and stay there for a long period of months, years, or 15 years, as was the case in Lebanon?”

With this rate of fighting on the Gaza front, and from past experiences, he adds, “Israel will likely find itself once again mired in the mud, in an armed guerrilla war against a civilian population hostile to the occupation and paramilitary organizations.”

Gil concludes, “In Lebanon, it was Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and the Palestinian organizations that fought the Israeli army and killed its soldiers, and in the Gaza Strip it will be the Hamas and Islamic Jihad movements, and who knows how many factions and armed groups there will be.”

Related posts

Siniora to Al Jazeera: We are approaching the hour of reaching a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon news

The war on Gaza is live… 4 new massacres in the Gaza Strip and Hezbollah bombs Israel with 340 missiles | news

Hezbollah publishes a video documenting the bombing of Tel Aviv with missiles and drones news