The Swiss newspaper Lutan expressed its regret for the surprising implicit approval of the world leaders for the mass destruction practiced by Israel in the Gaza Strip, by not making any effort to stop it, evoking the controversial “evil of evil”.
The newspaper reminded – in the Gutician column Ambros – the indiscriminate shelling, the systematic destruction of the civil infrastructure, the targeting of doctors and journalists, the siege of food and health, and was surprised how the principles and values on which the democratic state and international law in the Gaza Strip are continuing, with the silent approval of the world leaders, and if it sees that the prevention of journalists and the resulting media overflowing are based An important role in that.
The writer reminded the direct testimony of the daily hell experienced by the inhabitants of Gaza, which was published by the prominent French historian Jean -Pierre Felio, and said that it is valuable because it allows us to see what is indirectly acceptable, especially since opinions gradually adapt to conflicts in an worrying way, and that happened to the war in the Gaza Strip, which has become common and normal.
He said that the word “ordinary” is remarkably accurate even though it is terrible, as we find reports indicating that the Israeli society, which was shook by the October 7, 2023 attack, was generally turning a blind eye to unleashing violence against Palestinian civilians over the year and a half until now.
The newspaper evoked the term “the banality of evil”, which sparked severe controversy when the Jewish philosopher Hanna Arnet resorted to describing Adolf Aykman’s character during his trial by Israel in 1961.
Instead of the philosopher decides that she finds herself face to face with a demonic monster as expected, Hanna did not see only an ordinary and natural man to the point of shame, full of moral allegations, concluding that evil is not exceptional, but he infiltrates the apparent system of things to the point that the average citizen may become the worst executioner, without perfectly realized.
Arint saw that Ayhamman was not aware of what he was doing, and that the absence of thought is what allowed him to become one of the greatest criminals of his time, and made him submit without thinking to the criminal orders issued to him to the point of identification with it, noting that Nazi Germany was characterized by deliberate erasure of moral principles and regular prohibitions.
The newspaper implicitly linked what the philosopher said to what Israel is doing, which made what every person must have strongly condemning a collective acceptable matter, and thus obeying the “supreme orders even if it is illegal to the path of the human conscience dangerously.”
