The visit of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to Beirut has passed, but its dust has not subsided yet .. The “camps” occupied the top of its agenda, but the actual results of the visit kept it surrounded by a large amount of ambiguity and “uncertainty” .. a great noise that surrounded the visit and the accompanying meetings, most of which are included in the internal Lebanese politics accounts, and some of it overlapping with the regional moment accounts The international, and most important of all this and that, contributed to the “complexity” of the Palestinian house instead of contributing to its “arrangement”, so how?
It was said during the visit, and its livelihood, that the main goal of them is to “disarm the camps”, so there is no Palestinian weapon today outside it, and always under slogans and justifications “apparent in it mercy and its innerness in it,” of the kindness: respect for the sovereignty of the state and the law, exclusive weapon, removing excuses and withdrawing excuses from the hands of the enemy.
Such a great goal, which eliminates the effects of six decades of the existence of weapons, the Palestinian president must start his visit, and even before he begins to conduct extensive dialogues with the “lamb”, and they are the various factions of the PLO that he heads, and the movement of Hamas and Jihad, as well as “Islamic” groups and groups, gathered in the camps over the last quarter of the century, which witnessed a phenomenon “Armed Islam movements” from various schools and references.
Such a matter did not happen, and the “only legitimate actor”, who thought that his possession of the “ring” of the organization gives him the right to behave alone on behalf of everyone, and sometimes against the will of the majority of them .. Here, another example appears to misuse this “ring”, and the level of “arbitrariness” in managing the back of various entities and components active on the ground, so that we do not say the most influential and present. From the “only actor” himself.
It seems that Ramallah’s mind did not occur, that it is not enough for the president to pledge to disarm, because the issue on the ground is more complex .. Whoever gives the promise and pledge does not have the ability to fulfill them, and ensure their transfer into effect, for Palestinian reasons on the one hand, and another related to the complications of the Lebanese scene on the other hand .. The reality of this situation dictated to the presidency the management of consultations and dialogue with the “perpetrators” before the launch of the pledges, not She ignores them and turns her back to them.
But those who impeded the efforts and lawyers of “rearranged the Palestinian house” at the national level, in the most embarrassing circumstance and the most difficult stage .. Whoever turns his back on all the calls and demands to restore the organization and send it and broke the doors of active participation in it, will not be interested in “arranging” this house at the local -Lebanese level .. So the visit contributed to deepening the internal Palestinian differences, and added a new file to its old files accumulated, instead of being the entrance And to prepare for deeper, more comprehensive and further treatments.
The truth is that we are not surprised by the “lightness” in which this thorny file was dealt with, and a small degree of interest in the headlines and challenges facing the Palestinian presence in Lebanon, as the president, who rejects the idea of a weapon in the hands of his citizens and the resistance factions in the West Bank as in Gaza, will never be with the presence of this weapon in the hands of the sons of Lebanon’s camps, and he previously offered the removal of the “camps” years ago, but one of the Lebanese was not Ready to receive it and engage in its removal project.
And the president who has been talking about “exclusive weapon” in the hands of his authority, and always under the slogan: “One authority, one weapon, and one law”, will not hesitate to repeat these slogans in Baabda, and the Lebanese governmental companies, and in front of all of them from the representatives of the “Moeen” team from the Lebanese, even though the experience and weapon of the authority, it rises as conclusive evidence that this “one weapon” did not protect the people of Palestine in the West Bank (Gaza) He did not succeed in securing the headquarters of the authority and regions: “A, and B”, by virtue of the virtue of Oslo maps and its fateful divisions, and this prompted many Lebanese to ridicule “experiences” and “advice” that the Lebanese can learn after this visit, tolerate “sermons” and attitudes of this kind.
And if a team of the Lebanese, from officials and some of the opponents of Hezbollah and the “Shiite duo”, had picked up the invitation of President Abbas and “blowing” in it, for reasons stemming from the “internal Lebanese equation” and its accounts, believing that the withdrawal of the camps weapon may be a “good omen” to accelerate the disarmament of the resistance and the party, in response to the pressures of Washington, Tel Aviv and some Arabs, but that the professional level in Lebanon did not buy this “The goods”, or at least not bought them without scrutiny and scrutiny.
Here the sources say: The meetings that followed the visit between experts, professionals and security personnel from both parties, were not characterized by the same “celebration” that prevailed over the official meetings, and did not come at the level of “pumping” the hospitable media with this “penetration” .. The questions posed by the Lebanese team were loaded with doubts about the ability of the Palestinian official team to implement the covenant and fulfill its obligations.
Rather, it can be said that the Lebanese team, with its detailed data on the Palestinian armed deployment, is a number and several warehouses and storage places, and how it is distributed to the forces, factions and groups, he did not hesitate to embarrass his Palestinian counterpart, when he suggested that he start removing the “five” camps that Fatah and the authority has the greatest and dominant influence, in Beirut, Tripoli and the other. For a later stage.
Here, the ball moved to the Palestinian “Al -Muhawak” stadium, before the dispute erupted outside the meeting rooms, to affect the rules of opening and its cadres, who were apparently taken, and they were not part of the “decision -making mechanism”.
The witness is that the choice of the five camps to start stripping them of their weapons raised a serious question among many Palestinians and Lebanese, because the southern camps; South Litani, in the vicinity of Tire, was the first to be the starting point in this path, coinciding with the course of implementation of Resolution 1701, and the withdrawal of Hezbollah’s ongoing weapon in that region, and under the supervision of the Five -Fire Conflict Control Committee, in the American presidency.
An order like this, threw a thick shadow of doubt, about the context in which the issue of the “camps weapon” falls, and is it to stabilize the ceasefire and restore calm to southern Lebanon, or is it a step that falls in a greater context, regional and international, related to the pruning of the “resistors” nails in Lebanon and Palestine and the removal of its claws, free of charge and without charge, and at best, in advance, pre -submitted, before it is reassured Those who seek to accomplish this task that they will eventually receive the price: to curb the brutality and ensure the withdrawal of Israel, the least of the areas it occupied recently.
The negotiating Lebanese team, which is loaded with leadership, political and military directives, by avoiding dealing with the “camps weapon” with the logic of power, given the sensitivity of the “task” and its difficulty at the same time, did not care much about the story of the “only legitimate actor”, it is a site that realizes the complexities of the camp maps, this team began in contact with the rest of the Palestinian forces, and entered into a dialogue with it, and how much he was worthy of the president and his team, doing this, doing this, doing this The task is before going alone to the rooms of dialogue and negotiation with the Lebanese side.
I think that collective research with the Palestinian factions can be an entrance to talk about “camp security”, so that we do not see “Sabra and Shatila” again, in addition to guaranteeing the “basket” of civil, economic and social rights, which are prohibited from Palestinian refugees, especially with the presence of a team of Lebanese, who never minds that the “displacement” to the distant exile is the solution to the problem of Palestinian asylum in Lebanon, in light “Return”, and rejected the option of “resettlement” .. The choice of the Palestinians remaining in their camps, and their enjoyment of a decent decent life, is not on the agenda of this team.
The bottom line: There is no dust on the legitimacy of extending the sovereignty of the Lebanese state over all its lands, and the Palestinians have no right to object to the idea of ”exclusive weapons” and the project “Building the State”, and there is no “sanctity”, especially the “camps of the camps”, but the approach that the Authority and the visit did not help Lebanon, and added a new reason for the Palestinian division, and most importantly, it kept the file of the weapon stuck without a practical horizon for treatment The American pressure series- on the Palestinian and Lebanese resistances- led by Steve Witkev regionally and Morgan Ortigos Lebanese, instead of falling in the context of the arrangement of the Palestinian House and the development of Palestinian-Lebanese relations, and rescuing what can be saved.
The opinions in the article do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al -Jazeera.
