Military and strategic expert Colonel Hatem Karim Al-Falahi said that the Israeli army wants to stop the war even if the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) remains in power, due to the poor strategic situation of the country.
Among the reasons that Al-Falahi mentioned – during the military analysis section – that lie behind the occupation army’s desire to end the war on Gaza; is that the Iranian threat to Israel still exists, and that the northern front has put a lot of pressure on the occupation army during the past period, in addition to the fact that the “American military buildup” cannot remain in the region for a long time, because Washington has other priorities.
In a military reading of what CNN reported, quoting an American official, who said: “The Israeli army needs a period of rest and regrouping in anticipation of a war in the north,” Al-Falahi confirmed that the occupation is preparing in the north to wage a land, air and sea battle towards Lebanon, considering that Resolution 1707 must be implemented.
He pointed out that there are negotiations taking place between Hezbollah and America to reach an agreement in the coming period, and that Israel is preparing its military equipment in case an agreement is not reached between the two parties.
Stage Four
Al-Falahi said that the occupation is trying to put great pressure on Hamas during this period so that it will make many concessions, which will allow it to reach an agreement with conditions that will give it a period to reorganize its ranks before opening the northern front.
Al-Falahi had explained in a previous analysis that the fourth phase of the operations announced by the occupation builds on the previous phases, indicating that the occupation seeks to work through two plans in the sector in the next phase.
He explained that Plan A will depend on mobile offensive operations that penetrate areas that have not been entered before and will depend on intelligence information. He spoke about a major fallacy in this plan, which the occupation announced would “avoid the locations of the prisoners,” wondering why the occupation did not retrieve them if it knew where they were being held.
As for Plan B, Al-Falahi indicated that it depends on moving through the Netzarim and Philadelphi axes, carrying out offensive operations in multiple areas, searching for tunnels, and forcing the resistance not to move through continuous monitoring by drones and satellites, in addition to using agents and spies.
